Effect of smoking-related features and 731 immune cell phenotypes on esophageal cancer: a two-sample and mediated Mendelian randomized study.

Introduction: Numerous observational studies have indicated that smoking is a substantial risk factor for esophageal cancer. However, there is a shortage of research that delves into the specific causal relationship and potential mediators between the two. Our study aims to validate the correlation between smoking-related traits and esophageal cancer while exploring the possible mediating effects of immune factors. Methods: Initially, we conducted bidirectional univariate Mendelian Randomization (MR) analyses to forecast the causal effects linking smoking-related traits and esophageal cancer. Subsequently, we employed a two-step MR analysis to scrutinize immune cell phenotypes that could mediate these effects. Finally, the coefficient product method was employed to determine the precise mediating impact. Additionally, we have refined our sensitivity analysis to ensure the reliability of the outcomes. Results: After analysis, Smoking status: Never had a significant negative association with the incidence of esophageal cancer (inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method, p=1.82e-05, OR=0.10, 95%CI=0.04~0.29). Ever smoked (IVW, p=1.49e-02, OR=4.31, 95%CI=1.33~13.94) and Current tobacco smoking (IVW, p=1.49e-02, OR=4.31, 95%CI=1.33~13.94) showed the promoting effect on the pathogenesis of esophageal cancer. Through further examination, researchers discovered 21 immune cell phenotypes that have a causal relationship with esophageal cancer. After careful screening, two immune cell phenotypes were found to have potential mediating effects. In particular, it was observed that in the case of the preventive effect of Smoking status: Never on esophageal cancer, the absolute count of CD62L plasmacytoid dendritic cells mediated a reduction of 4.21%, while the mediating effect of CD27 in CD20-CD38-B cells was -4.12%. In addition, sensitivity analyses did not reveal significant heterogeneity or level pleiotropy. Conclusion: The study provides new evidence for the causal relationship between smoking-related features and esophageal cancer and proposes immune factors with potential mediating effects. However, this finding needs to be further demonstrated by more extensive clinical studies.

Effects and Prognosis of Cataract Surgery in Patients with Retinitis Pigmentosa.

INTRODUCTION: Cataract extraction could improve visual acuity (VA) for patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP), while the surgery may increase photoreceptor degeneration through light damage. In this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness and prediction of VA after cataract surgery in patients with RP. METHODS: We comprehensively extracted data from literature of available studies with quality control processing. Improvement of VA before and after cataract surgery of different durations of follow-up and different structural integrity of the preoperative macular ellipsoid zone (EZ) in patients with RP were compared. VA was measured by the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR). RESULTS: Sixteen studies were subjected to analysis. Postoperative VA was significantly improved versus preoperative, with a mean difference (MD) of 0.57 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45, 0.69], and a fixed-effect model was applied during follow-up durations of 1 day to 1 month (I2 = 0%). Similarly, for follow-up durations of 1-3 months, 3-6 months, and 6-12 months, postoperative VAs were all better than preoperative values, with MDs of 0.36 (95% CI 0.31, 0.41), 0.35 (95% CI 0.23, 0.46), and 0.22 (95% CI 0.14, 0.30) (I2 < 50%). For follow-up duration of 1-5 years, the random-effect model was applied for higher heterogeneity (I2 = 81%), with an MD of 0.26 (95% CI 0.09, 0.43). There was no significant difference in the improvement of the EZ-invisible group, with an MD of 0.27 (95% CI - 0.17, 0.70) (I2 = 82%). There were significant differences between EZ-abnormal and EZ-normal groups in preoperative and postoperative VA, with MDs of 0.56 (95% CI 0.27, 0.85) and 0.46 (95% CI 0.27, 0.65) (I2 > 50%). CONCLUSIONS: Cataract surgery could improve VA for patients with RP during long-term follow-up, and the surgery is not recommended for patients with invisible preoperative macular EZ. However, further studies are required to address the problem of excessive light exposure to the degenerated retina in patients with RP with the cataract removed. The study protocol was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42022340165).